5 Challenges with faculty and data strategy

In today’s accountability climate, institutional leaders create and rely on data- driven decisions to promote the success of their institutions. Much of this data collection is delegated to internal stakeholders, such as faculty members, to obtain and systematically report. I along with two graduate students have a new book chapter coming out on the faculty perspectives on the use of data in higher education. In today’s post, I want to share what we see as the five challenges facing higher education in the area of faculty and data strategy.

Photo credit: David Stewart

Types of Academic Service for Faculty

There are two primary ways to categorize types of faculty service (Fear & Sandmann, 1995; O’Meara, Terosky, & Neumann, 2008; Ward, 2003). First, there are service activities that take place on campus at the departmental, school, or institutional level. These local activities tend to focus on operations necessary to getting things done on campus. Second, professional service activities include those with professional organizations, scholarly journals, and other activities that support the work of the discipline. In today’s post, I want to share the two types of service that are critical for higher education and playing the important role as academic citizen.

 

Types of Academic Service for Faculty

Photo credit: tech crunch.com




Why we have tenure in higher education

If you’re going to write a book entitled How to Get Tenure, you are going to get a lot of comments about how tenure is ruining higher education. Even among faculty and certainly administrators, there is this sense that tenure is the cause of many of the problems facing higher education. While tenure is no doubt imperfect and I don’t need to rehash the criticisms here as they are well-known, there are numerous important aspects to tenure. In the excerpt below, I address these benefits and how they influence higher education.

Why we have tenure in higher education

Photo credit: Jason Tong



Exciting Announcement!

Today is an exciting day as I’m so happy to announce my latest book will be published in early July. “How to Get Tenure: Strategies for Successfully Navigating the Process” will be published by Routledge. I can’t wait to get this book out there for people to read and I hope it will help demystify the tenure process. Over the next few weeks leading up to the launch, I will share more details about the book. In today’s post, I want to provide some details of the book and my motivations for writing it.



History of tenure

Although vestiges of the modern tenure system can be found in higher education as far back as the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, tenure as we know it today is largely a by-product of the twentieth century. Aspects of today’s tenure system—such as faculty rank, longer lifetime appointments, and evaluation for performance—appeared in fits and starts during the 1800s. After the Civil War, colleges and universities began adopting the German higher education model, which emphasized science and research to an extent atypical even among the best American colleges of the day. With the growth of this research university model, American professors began to expect the same perks that their German colleagues enjoyed, including indefinite appointments except in cases of gross dereliction of duty (Hofstadter & Metzger, 1955). In today’s post, I want to share a little about the history of tenure to provide some context for understanding tenure in today’s university.

Photo credit: UW AAUP Chapter

In many ways, the tenure system can be directly tied back to the founding of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) in 1915.

Founders, including noted education philosopher John Dewey, sought protections for faculty after a series of highly publicized cases in which prominent faculty members were dismissed because of unpopular views.

Considered alongside a rise in disciplinary associations, the times demanded a strong voice supporting the role of faculty in higher education. The AAUP was formed as an organization that would advocate across all disciplines and higher education institutions.

With its founding, the AAUP promoted the value of academic freedom and, ultimately, the necessity of the “security of tenure” to protect this important ideal.

The AAUP put forth the first forceful case for the necessity of tenure in supporting the teaching and research missions of higher education. Yet, the concept of tenure was still relatively in flux until a more definitive statement on tenure was put forward in 1940.

At this time, the Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure was jointly created by the AAUP and the Association of American Colleges and Universities and remains the most significant document related to tenure in the history of the United States.

The Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure provided a  clear and stable concept of tenure, which remains the guiding framework across higher education today.

A key element of the AAUP’s original 1915 statement was the inclusion of judicial proceedings and due process as part of tenure. In addition, the AAUP established the guiding principle of a probationary period recognizable as the pre-tenure years.

The idea was that assistant professors would need to successfully complete a probationary period before receiving tenure (Pollitt & Kurland, 1998).

The AAUP’s 1940 Statement identifies the purposes of tenure as follows:

(1) freedom of teaching and research and of extramural activities, and (2) a sufficient degree of economic security to make the profession attractive to men and women of ability. Freedom and economic security, hence, tenure, are indispensable to the success of an institution in fulfilling its obligations to its1 students and to society.

In addition, the AAUP stated that faculty dismissal should be determined by a faculty trial, with written charges, and only for adequate cause. The clear purpose of these policies would be to protect professors by offering rights of due process and access to a jury of their colleagues.

From the very beginning, there was a legal element of the tenure process that remains an important aspect today.

One of the reasons tenure processes and policies bear remarkable similarities across institutions is that, while higher education institutions have existed for centuries, tenure was created over the past 100 years, making it a relatively new concept.

The importance of faculty evaluation along with administrative review is born out of the initial rationale for creating tenure. The basic steps that assistant professors will follow while going up for tenure are largely the same ones outlined by the AAUP back in 1940.

Tenure policies and procedures were designed from the beginning to promote the mission of higher education and not to provide leverage to either the faculty member or the institution.

Furthermore, the AAUP’s goal, which by most standards was quite successful, was to promote common procedures for tenure. As a result, pre-tenure faculty and institutions have a relatively well-established process and procedure for evaluating faculty at the conclusion of the probationary period.